1. “The Mazarin Stone” by Arthur Conan Doyle contains themes such as brotherly connection and cleverness. Holmes and Watson have this brotherly connection; they are a team and Holmes would not be able to solve all of his mysteries as effectively without his friend. When Holmes needed help, Watson made it very clear that he could be counted in because he had nothing else to do. Holmes is extremely clever when he slips the diamond in the lord’s pocket and the fact that he had a wax figure made of himself to distract his actual whereabouts.  
  2. “Sherlock Holmes” directed by Guy Ritchie contains themes such as quick thinking and manipulation. To solve crimes both Holmes and Watson have to think fast and anticipate their opponent’s next move. In one scene Holmes was fighting a challenger as a sport and editing was used to slow down and show the details of Holmes’ thoughts, which involved what he is going to do and even exactly the bones he was going to break and recovery time for his opponent. Manipulation occurs when Holmes left his gun on the table semi forcing Watson to come after him to help him. Also Irene tampering Holmes’ wine can be considered manipulation.
  3. An issue or problem involved with adapting the book into the film is that there are so many Sherlock Holmes stories. So it must be hard to base a movie off of just one because they are more like short stories. Guy Ritchie took the characters and principle of the film and made it his own. Also in the original Sherlock Holmes stories he did cocaine. That was not seen in the movie because it would take away from his heroic character and change the Hollywood rating to R. This is an issue because it is changing the story to please an audience in a different period of time.
  4. http://www.mysterynet.com/holmes/                                                                              This source tells a little bit about Doyle’s life including what he did before and after he invented Sherlock Holmes.                                                                  http://video.about.com/movies/Sherlock-Holmes-Robert-Downey.htm                                                                                                                                   This source is an interview with Robert Downey Jr. and in it he talks about how it was playing Sherlock Holmes and trying to balance the humor and drama of the character.                                                                                                           http://www.femail.com.au/guy-ritchie-sherlock-holmes-interview.htm                                                                                                                       This interview is essential in understanding the film because behind-the-scenes questions are asked that dig deep into important aspects of the film. Questions involving making a period film with a contemporary twist, how much Doyle originality Ritchie put in but also how Ritchie changed Holmes, and even the on screen relationship between Holmes and Watson. These questions are some of the ones that people think about when they watch a film that is based (loosely) on a book. This source helps give a better understanding of Ritchie’s intentions in making of the film and therefore helps people understand the film and see it in a different light. 
  5. Q: We see twice in the film Holmes’s clinical application of violence. Which does it show better: Holmes’s brilliant intellect, or his masculine physicality? Or does it show both equally well?

A: One scene in particular when Holmes was fighting an opponent in a ring shows his brilliant intellect and masculine physicality equally well which symbolizes Ritchie’s twist on the film. In a split second he knew what he was going to do to take him down and also had the strength to do so. This scene clearly shows it was the combination of both Holmes’s brilliant intellect and his masculine physicality that made him the detective that he is. Because Ritchie morphed Holmes into a character that he wanted him to be it changed Holmes and showed the audience the ultimate super hero figure. Ritchie did this to please an audience because just a smart detective would not be as appealing than a smart and strong one, he would just be a geek. This is a way that Ritchie tweaked Holmes’ character and made it his own.

Advertisements
  1. Laurence Sterne’s The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentlemen is a story that centralizes on the insecurities of Tristram Shandy. This novel mentions in many different ways the insecurities that Shandy has. For example, in chapter five when he wished that he was born on another planet and when he said that fortune was not on his side. He is feeling sad for himself and feels as if he is unlucky therefore making him insecure. He even said in chapter 7 that he is not a wise man, so time and time again he is putting himself down and wishing he were different. Another theme could be his father’s exactness, which could have affected Shandy in a negative way.
  2. The main themes of the film Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story chaos, sacrifice, and insecurities. Chaos meaning that the film was showing that the main actor’s life is just as chaotic as the person he was portraying; and also what was said in the movie that life is too chaotic to categorize it. Sacrifice meaning the extent that one is willing to sacrifice in order to achieve a goal (time with family, sleep, free time etc.).  The main actors insecurities were his nose, his size/height (shoes) and his need to be the center of attention and bigger than everyone else.
  3. The issues and problems involved with adapting the book into the film are that they felt the need to include a completely different story about them making a film based on the book. So it seems like a story within a story, which may be confusing to some viewers and distract them from the actual facts and themes in the original book. Perhaps they thought that the story was not interesting enough and needed more. It puts a different twist to the story but also making it seem not like the story at all.
  4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vjbyxIsKIY

This video does a nice job in quoting some of the book while showing different parts in the movie.

http://thevoid99.blogspot.com/2012/04/tristram-shandy-cock-bull-story.html

This blog digs deep into many aspects of the film. The importance of the source in understanding the film is because it describes in detail the plot of the film and how it is a satire. The author also touches on the set/costumes, cinematography and the cast. She points out a few things that were new to me for example some of the characters played themselves.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books-the-life-and-opinions-of-tristram-shandy-1361311.html

This is an article about how someone went on the journey of turning Tristram Shandy into a graphic novel or comic book and the obstacles he faced doing so.                                                                                                

 

  1. Q: At one moment in the film, we hear news about the war in Afghanistan on the radio, but no characters respond to it or comment upon it. What is Winterbottom trying to say with this short interlude?

A: Nobody responds or comments upon the news about the war in Iraq, which is odd, but it is because no one cares. They are so wrapped up in making of the film that they do not have time to care about the war. It is ironic though that they were so obsessed about the fake war in the movie but the real war in reality did not faze them. Winterbottom used this short moment in the film to further imply the theme of chaos in the movie.

  1. Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland is a magical story filled with random adventure after adventure. The reader never knows what is going to happen next; everything is new and different. The story is bursting with identity (“…who in the world am I?”) and impossible (“…very few things indeed were really impossible”) themes. There are also some instances of parallel (Dinah and Cheshire) and opposites (eat/drink me) that can be considered themes as well.
  2. Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland has the unknown and dreamlike qualities to it but it flows a little more like a story as the viewer has an idea of what is going to happen because of the caterpillar’s scroll. The dark set and extraordinary costumes give the story an interesting twist. One of the major themes is the identity/muchness theme (The wrong Alice/Hardly and almost Alice). Another theme is the opposites and impossible themes. Opposite is for example what is real and not real and impossible is that Alice’s father and her thinking of 6 impossible things before breakfast.
  3. The issues and problems with adapting the book into the film are two centuries. Two centuries later the movie is going to appeal to viewers now not back then. It is more modernized and the updated plot reflects that. If the book was transformed into a television version the characters might be the same but one of two things will happen. One that the story will be extremely drawn out with a lot more made up detail in order to run the show for a couple seasons. Or two that the story with be completely different with a lot of new adventures that Alice will go on (very much like The Little Mermaid TV show).
  4. http://stranger941.hubpages.com/hub/Alice-in-Wonderland-What-Intriguing-Message-Does-it-really-Hold

This source describes the book as a story about the journey of a child growing into adolescence. Everything in Wonderland correlates to something in real life. This source is important in understanding the story/film because it points out that the whole entire story is about Alice’s identity and growth. Throughout the story she becomes more independent and mature by making decisions on her own like eating the mushroom from her pocket when the queen wants to kill her (making her own decisions). There are good and bad choices and Alice learns which is which as the story progresses. She grows and matures and finds her muchness from the being of the film to the end. At the beginning she even agreed that she was the wrong Alice because that is what the caterpillar said but then at the end of the movie she slays the dragon proving she is the “right” Alice.

http://www.osnews.com/story/22972/It_Doesn_t_Add_up_Mathematics_in_Wonderland

This source describes how combining the two books (“Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” and “Through the Looking-Glass”) is dangerous because they are so different; and that the mathematics of the story is all wrong but it can be because it is all made up in Alice’s mind.

http://www.jeffsreviews.com/Articles/movies%20jan10-/alice.html

This source describes the movie as being worthwhile because of the CGI, audio and blu-ray high definition but the story lacks in an emotion and a clear flow of where the movie is headed.

5. Q: Like Burton’s Willy Wonka, the main character in Alice in Wonderland has “daddy issues.” What are these issues and do they add depth to the story, or do they serve as an unwanted distraction (as in Willy Wonka)?

A: Alice’s daddy issues add depth to the story, enhancing it and pushing her to become the Alice she is meant to be. Not like Willy Wonka where his daddy issues controlled him and affected his mindset in a negative way distracting the audience from the actual story. His issues are that his dad was obsessed with Willy not being able to eat candy like the other kids did for example on Halloween. Alice’s daddy issues are simply his death. That issue helped her to be braver and have a more open mindset about impossible things for example when she listed them out as she was slaying the dragon.

 

Welcome to WordPress.com! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!